There is a gap that gets discussed less than the skills gap or the knowledge gap: the distance between how capable someone is and how capable they feel, on a given day, in a given room.
For many senior people that distance is wide, and unlike most professional difficulties it tends to widen with advancement rather than close.
Why the Feedback Loop Breaks
Early on, confidence and competence develop together because the loop is tight. You learn something, apply it, get feedback, improve. The signal arrives quickly and legibly.
Higher up, the loop stops working that way. Problems are less defined, feedback is slower and filtered through politics, and outcomes resolve over years. The capabilities that produced the career, precision and relentless preparation among them, are weaker guides in conditions where ambiguity is permanent.
What follows is a reading rather than a finding: a capable person in that situation can reasonably feel less certain than an onlooker thinks the situation warrants, and the feeling is tracking the measurement problem rather than the capability.
A Caution About the Usual Explanation
Two popular frameworks get reached for here, and both need handling with more care than they usually get.
The first is mindset. An earlier version of this article cited Dweck’s distinction between a fixed mindset, where intelligence is static, and a growth mindset, where it can be developed, as settled ground. The concept is useful and the evidence for its effects is thin.
Sisk, Burgoyne, Sun, Butler and Macnamara ran two meta-analyses in Psychological Science in 2018. The first covered 273 studies and 365,915 participants on the relationship between mindset and academic achievement; the second covered 43 studies and 57,155 participants on whether mindset interventions improve achievement. Their summary: “Overall effects were weak for both meta-analyses.” Some support remained for specific groups, namely students of low socioeconomic status or academically at risk.
A 2019 randomised trial by the Education Endowment Foundation found “no significant increase in numeracy or literacy” from mindset training. And worth noting that all of this concerns schoolwork. Nobody has measured what mindset training does for a forty-eight-year-old running a division.
The second framework is the familiar claim that expertise makes people feel less capable while incompetence makes them feel more so. That pattern is contested too: Gignac and Zajenkowski argued in 2020 that “regression toward the mean in combination with other cognitive biases, like the better-than-average effect, can explain most of the empirical findings.” An earlier version of this article asserted it as mechanism. It is not available as one.
What survives both corrections is the observation at the start, which needs neither framework: senior work supplies less clear feedback, and less clear feedback produces less settled self-assessment.
Three Shapes It Takes
These are descriptions, offered because they are recognisable, not because anyone has measured their distribution.
The role is earned and the conviction has not arrived
Credentials, results and tenure accumulate, and some part of the person stays unpersuaded, with a sense of being one difficult quarter from exposure. The pattern conceals itself, because each new achievement is treated as the one that will finally settle it.
Clance and Imes described this in 1978 after clinical work with 150 highly successful women who explained achievements away while retaining criticism as evidence of deficiency. They were describing a pattern rather than measuring how common it is, and later work using structured questionnaires found men reporting it with comparable frequency.
The standard that cannot be met
This one rarely gets named as a confidence problem, because it presents as high standards. The operational costs are over-preparation, under-delegation and a consistent inability to recognise when good enough is sufficient.
There is evidence here that the article previously lacked. Harari, Swider, Steed and Breidenthal pooled the workplace research on perfectionism in 2018 and found that “neither excellence-seeking nor failure-avoiding perfectionism were significantly associated with job performance”. So the standard is not buying the output it claims to buy.
The confidence that belongs to the role
The subtlest version. Confidence is stable while the title is stable, and moves when the title moves. It becomes visible at transitions: the person who leaves a role and loses their bearings, or who is promoted into larger scope and feels like an impostor again at a higher salary.
What It Plausibly Costs, Said Honestly
An earlier version of this article called this a business problem showing up “in concrete, measurable ways” and then listed four costs: slower decisions, risk aversion at the wrong moments, talent loss and a stalled career. No measurement was offered for any of them, and none has been found.
They are plausible, and plausible is the correct word. Someone waiting to feel more certain before committing will decide later than someone who is not. Someone whose exposure feels unmanageable will avoid the visible call. Whether these are large effects, small ones, or artefacts of how the people describing them remember their own careers is not something this article can establish.
Stating that is more useful than a confident list, because a reader can check a plausible mechanism against their own week. A measured claim they cannot check just has to be believed.
Where It Comes From
Crocker and Wolfe named the mechanism in Psychological Review in 2001: contingencies of self-worth, the specific domains in which a sense of being worthwhile is staked on how things turn out.
In those domains, they write, “people typically have the goal to prove themselves rather than the goal to learn, grow, or improve themselves”. If competence is where worth is staked, then ambiguity about an outcome arrives as ambiguity about the person, and the ambiguity of senior work is permanent.
They also describe the arrangement as “a trade-off between increased motivation and increased emotional vulnerability”, which is why the usual interventions miss. Presentation training and better preparation address the output. The staking is what makes the uncertainty personal, and it is untouched by either.
What Is Worth Doing
Still a reading rather than a finding, and the claims here are modest.
- Write the record down. Someone running this pattern usually holds a distorted version of their own history, discounting results as luck or the team and keeping failures at full weight. A written review, built from instances rather than impressions, at least makes the distortion visible.
- Separate the worth from the output. Not lower standards. A reference point that does not move with the last quarter, which Crocker’s account suggests is the thing actually under strain.
- Notice what is portable. If confidence is coupled to the title, the question is what remains when the title changes, and that is answerable before the change rather than during it.
And if the self-doubt has stopped looking like a question about work and is affecting how you function, that belongs with a licensed professional. Nothing here substitutes for one, including the assessment below.
One Question Worth Sitting With
When something goes well, does it register as evidence of capability, or as having got away with it again?
That produces no verdict and nothing follows automatically from either answer. It is useful because the two feel similar from the inside and point at different things.
Where Your Worth Is Currently Staked
Crocker’s point is that the domains are specific, which means they can be named. The Executive Identity Profile is a confidential assessment of where your sense of worth currently rests across five dimensions, and which of them is carrying more than it should. It takes about ten minutes, and it opens a conversation rather than closing one. Begin your profile here.
If this was worth your time, there is a letter. One short piece a week on identity, self-worth and the arithmetic of senior work. It costs nothing, and leaving takes one click. See what arrives.
References
- Sisk, V. F., Burgoyne, A. P., Sun, J., Butler, J. L., & Macnamara, B. N. (2018). To what extent and under which circumstances are growth mind-sets important to academic achievement? Two meta-analyses. Psychological Science, 29(4), 549–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617739704
- Education Endowment Foundation (2019), randomised trial of mindset training.
- Gignac, G. E., & Zajenkowski, M. (2020). The Dunning-Kruger effect is (mostly) a statistical artefact. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2020.101449
- Harari, D., Swider, B. W., Steed, L. B., & Breidenthal, A. P. (2018). Is perfect good? A meta-analysis of perfectionism in the workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(10). https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000324
- Crocker, J., & Wolfe, C. T. (2001). Contingencies of self-worth. Psychological Review, 108, 593–623. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.593
- Clance, P. R., & Imes, S. A. (1978). The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 15(3), 241–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0086006
Continue Reading
Related Articles
→ Impostor Syndrome in High Achievers: Why Success Makes It Worse
→ The Confidence Paradox: Why the Most Competent People Feel the Least Certain
→ Self-Worth in the Boardroom: Why It’s the Skill No One Teaches
References
- Clance, P. R., & Imes, S. A. (1978). The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 15(3), 241–247.
- Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. Random House.
Further Reading
If this resonated, these go deeper. You can also browse the full Research Library for all recommendations.
- The Secret Thoughts of Successful Women by Valerie Young. The definitive guide to impostor syndrome, written specifically for high achievers who’ve achieved everything except certainty they belong.
- Mindset by Carol Dweck. The research behind fixed vs. growth mindset, and why your beliefs about ability shape performance more than talent alone.
- The Gifts of Imperfection by Brené Brown. On letting go of what you think you should be and embracing who you are, a quieter but often more transformative read than Daring Greatly.
Related reading